"was a room for mummification, not a tomb? A very little credible ...
Tuesday, 14. March 2006, 5:21:06
Pharaonic era "Finding a room for mummification, not a tomb?
A highly implausible idea ...
By Georgeos Diaz-Montexano. 03/13/2006. Madrid, Spain.
a few hours ago, the news service dre
could spread bad smells better.
other hand, if KV63 is not even a secondary grave, or tomb
reburial or cachette ", then it can not be classified as KV63
because this classification has only been used for graves and
"cachette" but never to name any
room dedicated to any job or profession.
Most readers of the most important release of News about ancient Egypt (such as:
http://egyptology.blogspot.com/
,
and
http://touregypt.net/TEBlog/egyptologynews/
)
know that from the first time that
disclosed the news about the discovery of KV63, and posted their pictures, I
proposed the hypothesis that the jars were actually improvised
most likely going to find in embalmed bodies, or
materials that were to somehow link these jars with
possible symbolic use as substitutes for Canopic Jars. Meanwhile, all Egyptologists always said that surely were jars for storing grain or food. Now, it is known that were not used for food storage jars, and I believe there can be a simple coincidence
, which is just offLXC original
enlarged. Heather Alexander
(Ankhesenamun), because the resemblance is quite remarkable.
I still think this is a secondary burial, ie a "cachette" where
0 comments:
Post a Comment